The increasing size of medical malpractice awards has caused malpractice insurance costs to skyrocket, driving
some physicians with high risk coverage, such as OB-GYNs and anesthesiology to move to states that have passed tort reform laws. In 2003, Ohio passed a similar law to prevent the flight of OB-GYNs to other states. Do you think it is fair to the injured party to have a state law limit the amount that can be recovered in a medical malpractice suit?
Public Comments
- <>I think 99.99% of all medical malpractice suits are BS and the ridiculous settlements people get for this hrosesh*t needs to stop. Now, if someone is truly grievously injured and the case merits it, then they might deserve a punitive award. The problem is, if you cap all awards, then that "one-in-ten-thousand" might not get what he/she deserves. And if you leave the door open for that person, then eventually you start getting a LOT of stupid awards again shortly. I guess the best answer, in order to cut the crap, is to cap them all and "sorry!" to the few who might deserve more.
- No, it should be limited to $10,000. This would bring down the cost of healthcare.
- When I see a doctor driving a 96 suburban like I do, they'll get my sympathy. Until then, They should be held responsible for their mistakes.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers